.... Specialising in reducing accelerated erosion

Teck Cominco Riverbank Restoration Project

Go To:

Implementation/Construction

Repair and Maintenance

Monitoring Results

Compost Tea Application

Introduction:   In December of 2004 Terra Erosion Control Ltd, in association with Amec Earth Environmental, competitively won the contract to develop a prescription and cost estimate for the riverbank restoration project. In 2005 Terra Erosion Control Ltd was retained to implement the prescribed treatments from 2006 to 2008.

Location: Riverbank and hillside adjacent to the Teck Cominco lead-zinc smelter and the Columbia River in Trail, BC.

Client: Teck Cominco Metals Limited

Objective: Establish vegetation on the hillside and adjacent riverbank below the lead-zinc smelter in order to reduce/control soil erosion and improve visual, wildlife and fish habitat values. 

Teck Cominco and it's predecessor have operated a smelter in Trail since the later 1800's.  Evidence of the long operation can be found on the slope below the smelter with the presence of bricks, smelter slag, metal bits and a variety of other materials.  A number of previous attempts to re-vegetate the area have been made; in general these have been met with poor to, at best, moderate success. The current project, which uses soil bioengineering techniques, is expected to yield a more satisfactory solution.

For this project the hillside below the smelter was divided into four treatment units and the adjacent riverbank into five treatment sections. Live cuttings used in the soil bioengineering structures were collected locally starting in the fall of 2005.

 

 
 
Tech Cominco smelter, 1930's (photo: Ministry of Environment, Nelson, B.C.)

Teck Cominco smelter in the 1930's

 

Hillside Unit 1 and riverbank 2004, pre-treatment (photo: Amec Earth and Env.)
Hillside and Riverbank Unit 1 in 2004 (pre-treatment)
Hillside Units 1 and 2 and riverbank 2004, pre-treatment (photo: Amec Earth and Env.)

Hillside Units 1 and 2 and riverbank 2004 (pre-treatment)

Hillside Units 2 and 3 and riverbank 2004, pre-treatment (photo: Amec Earth and Env.)

Hillside Units 2 and 3 and riverbank in 2004 (pre-treatment)

 
Hillside Units 3 and 4 and riverbank 2004, pre-treatment (photo: Amec Earth and Env.)

 Hillside Units 3 and 4 and riverbank in 2004 (pre-treatment)

2005 Aerial photo of hillside, pre-treatment (photo: Teck Cominco Metals Ltd.)

2005 Aerial photo of hillside (pre-treatment)

 

 

Implementation/Contruction:

Riverbank Sections: In the spring and fall of 2006 soil bioengineering structures were installed along the Columbia River . These consisted primarily of brush layers, but also brush sills in combination with live fascines and vegetated rip-rap. The species component of these structures consisted of a mixture of Willow ( Salix bebbiana / scouleriana / exigua ), Black Cottonwood ( Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa ), Red-Osier Dogwood ( Cornus stolonifera ), and a small amount of Pacific Willow ( Salix lucida ssp. lasiandra ). Planting was machine-assisted using an excavator.

A section of the brush sill / fascine structures was destroyed in spring 2008 due to extension of the riverbank road. During construction a vegetated rip-rap application was installed along this new section of road containing a high component of Pacific Willow (medium sized tree). It is intended to provide a visual filter for the wall located behind the road.

A total of approximately 27,000 live cuttings were planted in Sections 1 to 3A, between 2006 and 2008, over an area of 0.5 ha.

   
Vegetated riprap installation riverbank,
spring 2006

Vegetated riprap installation riverbank spring 2006

Machine assisted brush layers installation riverbank, spring 2006

Machine assisted brush layers installation, riverbank spring 2006

   
Hillside Units: Installation of soil bioengineering structures on the hillside units commenced in fall 2006 (Units 3 and 4), continued in spring 2007 (Units 2, 3 and 4), and was completed in spring 2008 (Unit 1). Two small areas in Unit 4, with a slope gradient less than 40 %, were planted using an excavator. In areas with slopes greater than 40 % (the bulk of these units), machine-assisted planting was done using a walking excavator (Spyder Hoe). On slopes greater than 60 % this machine was tethered to a skidder located at the top of the slope. Materials were either transported up the slope using an overhead cable system (Units 2 to 4), or lowered down onto the slope using a cable / buggy system (Unit 1).

The soil bioengineering structures consist of brush layers planted using a mixture of Black Cottonwood and Willow species. Straw wattles were also installed across the slope between every second brush layer. These are designed to disperse surface water and act as sediment traps, reducing the risk of surface flow leading to rill erosion. The hillside units were also planted with native shrubs and conifer trees and hydro-seeded with native grasses. Due to the dry conditions on this site during the summer, an irrigation system was installed over all areas.

In 2007, trials using pulp-mill biosolids as a soil amendment were carried out in the more contaminated areas of Unit 3. Due to favourable results obtained here, this material was used extensively in Unit 1 (2008) during brush layer installation in areas where the soil had higher levels of contamination. A total of 300 cubic meters of this material was applied to this unit.

A total of approximately 148,000 live cuttings, 11,900 shrubs and tree seedlings were planted in Units 1 to 4 between 2006 and 2008 over an area of 3.29 ha.

 

Vegetated riprap installation riverbank,
spring 2008
Vegetated riprap installation, riverbank spring 2008
Brush layer planting with excavator in Unit 4, spring 2006

Brush layer planting with excavator in Unit 4, spring 2006

   
Brush layer planting with Spyder Hoe in Unit 3, spring 2007

Brush layer planting with Spyder Hoe in Unit 3, spring 2007

Brush layer planting with Spyder Hoe in Unit 3, spring 2007

Brush layer planting with Spyder Hoe in Unit 3, spring 2007

Placement of biosolids on slope on slope of Unit 1, spring 2008

Placement of biosolids on slope on slope of Unit 1, spring 2008

 
Brush layer planting in Unit 1, spring 2008

Brush layer planting in Unit 1, spring 2008

   
Brush layer planting in Unit 1, spring 2008

Brush layer planting in Unit 1, spring 2008

Straw wattles installed to control surface erosion

Straw wattles installed to control service erosion

 

   
Cable system used to transport materials onto
slope Unit 4, spring 2007
Cable system used to transport materials onto the slope
Cable/buggy system used to transport materials
onto slope Unit 1, spring 2008

Cable/buggy system used to transport materials onto slope

   

Repair and Maintenance:

Due to surface rill erosion in some areas, resulting mainly from irrigation water flowing over soil with poor grass cover (due to soil toxicity), repair / maintenance treatments were needed on the hillside units in the spring and fall of 2008. These consisted primarily of placing coir matting over critical areas and the installation of additional straw wattles, some of which included burlap splash aprons (these aprons improve the effectiveness of wattles in steep areas).

   
Coir matting placed on critical area at top of slope, spring 2008

Coir matting placed on critical area at top of slope, spring 2008

Straw wattles with burlap aprons in Unit 2, September 2008

Straw wattles with burlap aprons in Unit 2, September 2008

   
Straw wattle with burlap apron, September 2008

Straw wattle with burlap apron, September 2008

   

Monitoring Results:

Riverbank Sections:  As of August 2008, survival and growth of the soil bioengineering structures installed in the riverbank sections has been good to excellent overall. In some areas, however, survival was reduced due to prolonged river flooding. When the brush layers were submerged by water during flooding, survival was still good if the top of growing shoots remained above the water. Additional monitoring took place until the Fall of 2014. 

Riverbank Section 1, May 2008

Riverbank Section 1, May 2008

Riverbank Section 1 South, summer 2010

   
Riverbank Section 1 North, summer 2010

   
Riverbank Section 1A, summer 2008

Riverbank Section 1A, August 2008

   
Riverbank Section 1A South, August 2008
   
Riverbank Section 2 during flooding, spring 2007

Riverbank Section 2 during flooding, spring 2007

Riverbank Section 2, August 2008

Riverbank Section 2, August 2008

   
Riverbank Section 1 & 2, September 2008
(photo: Teck Cominco)

Riverbank Section 1 & 2, September 2008

Riverbank Section 3, August 2008

 

   
Riverbank Section 3 & Unit 4 above road, August 2008 (photo: Teck Cominco)

 

Riverbank Section 3 & Unit 4 above road, August 2008 (photo: Teck Cominco)
   

Hillside Units 2 to 4:  Survival and growth of brush layers planted in Units 2, 3 and 4 was highly variable when assessed in August 2008 (these brush layers had two seasons of growth at this time). The average survival rate of planted cuttings, based on data collected in 11 permanent sampling plots, was 42 %. This value is considered only a rough estimate, as the S. D. (24 %) and range (7 % to 86 %) were high. Some areas with very good survival and growth were present, along with areas with very poor survival and growth. High mortality in some areas is thought due to one or more of the following: high soil metal concentrations, very hot and dry conditions during the summer of 2007 combined with poor irrigation coverage, heavy grass competition, and high soil salinity levels.

 
Hillside Unit 2, August 2008

Hillside Unit 2, August 2008

Hillside Unit 3, August 2008

Hillside Unit 3, August 2008

   
Hillside Unit 3, August 2008

Hillside Unit 3, August 2008

Hillside Units 2 and 3, August 2008

Hillside Units 2 and 3, August 2008

   
Hillside Units 2 and 3, August 2008

Hillside Units 2 and 3, August 2008

Hillside Unit 4, August 2008

Hillside Unit 4, August 2008

   
Hillside Unit 4, August 2008

Hillside Unit 4, August 2008

   
Unit 1:  Survival and growth of brush layers in Unit 1 was very good when assessed in August 2008. Based on data collected in six permanent sampling plots, the average survival rate of planted cuttings was 87 % (S.D. 6 %). The application rate of biosolids in areas with highly toxic soil was highly variable – this could be seen in the patchy colour (dark green patches next to chlorotic patches) of foliage in these areas.
 
Hillside Unit 1 North, August 2008

Hillside Unit 1 North, August 2008

Hillside Unit 1 South, August 2008

Hillside Unit 1 South, August 2008

   
Hillside Unit 1, August 2008

Hillside Unit 1, August 2008

 
Section 1, summer 2010
 
Section 1A, summer 2010

 
Section 1, 1A and 2, summer 2010

 
Monitoring:  Monitoring of the riverbank and hillside units was completed in the Fall of 2014.
Unit 1 Fall 2013

   
Unit 1 South, Fall 2014

   
Unit 3 Fall 2014

Unit 3 Salix lasiandra Fall 2013

 
Unit 3 Salix lasiandra Fall 2013

   
Section 1 Fall 2014

Section 1 Fall 2014

   
Section 1 Fall 2014

Section 1A Fall 2014

   
Section 3 Fall 2014

Section 3 Fall 2014

   
Before, 2006

   
Hillside Fall 2014

   

Compost Tea Application:

The importance of a healthy soil (and foliar) microbial community to proper ecosystem functioning is well recognized. Compost tea is a technology developed to help replenish and restore this community on lands where it is degraded – plant growth is typically improved with tea applications containing the correct mix of beneficial organisms for the vegetation being grown (Ingham, 2005). Compost Tea production is a “cold brewing” process, allowing growth of organisms extracted from the compost. Various organic foods / organic fertilizers are added during the brewing process to provide food & nutrient substrates for the microbial organisms to grow. The degree to which fungal growth, versus bacterial growth, is sustained during the brewing process will depend on the quality of the initial compost used and the type of food / nutrients added. It is important that the process remain aerobic during the brewing process and up until the tea is applied – if the tea becomes anaerobic, beneficial organisms (aerobic fungi, protozoa and nematodes) may be lost, replaced by anaerobic bacteria and yeasts (Ingham, 2005).

Given the contaminated nature of the soil and lack of vegetation in the Riverbank Restoration Project area prior to the present reclamation treatments, restoration of the microbial community here is considered a vital component of the project. To help achieve this, three compost tea applications are scheduled for each year until 2011. As of fall 2008, five compost tea applications have been done (two in 2007 and three in 2008). The compost tea is applied through injection into the irrigation system.

 

Brewing compost Tea

Brewing Compost Tea

Injection of compost tea into irrigation system

Injection of compost tea into irrigation system

   
A Soil Foodweb Drawing (Drawing: USDA-NRCS)

A Soil Foodweb Drawing (Drawing: USDA-NRCS)

References Cited:

Ingham, E. (2005). The Compost Tea Brewing Manual, 5 th edition. Soil Foodweb Incorporated, Corvallis , Oregon .

 

home

Copyright © 2010 Terra Erosion Control Ltd.

Riverbank Restoration Project ~ Teck Cominco